The realm of Original Research is broad and varied. Our multidisciplinary journal, IgMin Research – STEM, accommodates a range of sub-types of Original Research, providing a rich canvas for scientific exploration and discourse. The following are the sub-types that are entertained by our journal:
Each sub-type requires unique considerations for methodology and data presentation. However, the fundamental criteria for acceptance and basic structure remain consistent across all types.
The purpose of this section is to inform potential authors about the rigorous criteria that submissions for "Original Research" must meet to be considered for publication in IgMin Research – STEM. These criteria apply across all sub-types of articles, whether they are Experimental Research, Observational Research, Clinical Trials, Field Studies, Laboratory Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, or Longitudinal Studies.
Besides these fundamental criteria, there are other aspects to consider which cut across all sub-types:
Meeting these criteria of acceptance does not guarantee publication, as all articles are subject to a rigorous peer-review process. However, addressing these points will strengthen the likelihood of a positive review. They serve as a guide to the elements that reviewers and the editorial board consider crucial in evaluating a submission's suitability for publication in IgMin Research – STEM.
By following these guidelines, authors can align their research and presentation thereof with the values and standards of IgMin Research – STEM. Adherence to these criteria will not only streamline the review process but also enhance the scientific integrity and impact of the published research.
To be accepted, articles must adhere to a set of rigorous standards to ensure they meet the scientific and ethical requirements of IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal.
Below are the key guidelines for each article type
Ensuring that your article adheres to these guidelines not only adds to the credibility of your research but also enhances its utility in scientific discourse. Non-compliance can be a significant factor in the rejection of a manuscript, regardless of the quality of the data or findings.
The structure of an article is the skeleton upon which the meat of your research hangs. A well-structured article not only directs the reader through your arguments effectively but also serves as a guide during the writing process. Below are the standard sections that should be present in all sub-types of Original Research articles.
The formatting guidelines outlined here are crucial for a streamlined review and publication process. Adherence to these guidelines is mandatory. Failure to comply will result in delays or possible rejection of the submitted manuscript.
The Author Instructions section aims to provide a comprehensive set of guidelines to aid you in preparing your manuscript for submission to "IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal." This segment outlines the essentials for an organized, well-structured manuscript that conforms to the journal's specific requirements.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that manuscripts involving human or animal studies comply with relevant ethical guidelines and institutional or national research ethics committee approvals.
Manuscripts must include a section on the availability of data and materials. Data should be accessible in a recognized data repository, and the manuscript should offer a clear path for replicating results.
Should the manuscript be returned for revisions, it is the corresponding author's responsibility to submit the revised manuscript and respond to reviewers' comments within the stipulated timeframe.
The journal adheres to a rigorous double-blind peer review process. Authors will be notified of acceptance, revision, or rejection via email.
Manuscripts that have been made available as preprints will be considered for publication. However, authors should disclose this during the submission process.
The journal operates on an open-access model, which may involve Article Processing Charges (APCs). Authors will be informed of any applicable charges upon acceptance.
Upon acceptance, authors will be required to complete a copyright transfer agreement. The work will be published under a Creative Commons license, allowing for maximum visibility and impact.
Authors will receive a link to the published article and are encouraged to share this widely. The journal will also undertake various methods to promote the article to a broader audience.
Should you decide to withdraw your manuscript after submission, notify the editorial office immediately. Charges may apply if the review process has commenced.
By adhering to the above guidelines and recommendations, you contribute to a more effective, streamlined review process, which benefits not only you as the author but also the broader scientific community.
Authorship is a critical element of scholarly work, representing not only recognition for one's contributions but also accountability for the scientific integrity of the work. Consequently, it is important to clarify how our journal defines authorship.
In line with standard scholarly guidelines, an "author" is defined as someone who has made a substantial intellectual contribution to a study. This includes planning the research design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. Every author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content.
Given the emerging complexities around machine learning and automation, it's imperative to outline our policy on non-human authorship. In our current editorial framework, Large Language Models like ChatGPT do not satisfy the requirements for authorship for several reasons:
While they may not be authors, LLMs like ChatGPT can still play a role in the research process. They can assist in data collection, literature search, and even provide suggestions for writing. However, it is crucial for authors to disclose the use of these models transparently.
At the end of the day, authorship should reflect a genuine intellectual contribution to a study and the willingness to take public responsibility for the content. Our journal adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for responsible research publication.
By acknowledging these various dimensions of authorship and clarifying the role that LLMs can play, we aim to uphold the highest standards of scholarly integrity.
This refers to the set protocols, methods, and practices that authors must adhere to when submitting their manuscripts for review and eventual publication.
This involves how you layout the content within your paper, including the arrangement of sections such as the introduction, methods, results, and conclusions.
This is the first page of your manuscript that contains crucial details like the title, authors' names, affiliations, and contact information.
This is a brief overview of the study, summarizing the main objectives, methods used, key findings, and conclusions.
These are specific words or phrases that capture the essence of the paper. They help in the indexing and searching of the paper in academic databases.
This section provides the context for the study. It introduces the problem, outlines the objectives, and gives an overview of what the study will cover.
This part describes the methodologies employed in the study. It should be detailed enough for other researchers to replicate the study.
This section presents the data collected during the study, usually in the form of tables, figures, or text.
This part interprets the data, considering the implications, limitations, and possible applications. It often compares the results with previous research.
This section summarizes the study, reiterating its key findings and their implications, and often proposes avenues for future research.
This part includes various declarations such as conflicts of interest, ethical approvals, and acknowledgments.
This section is essential for studies involving humans or animals, detailing the ethical considerations and approvals received.
This involves the consent from all authors to publish the manuscript, often formalized in a signed document.
This pertains to how and where the data supporting the findings can be accessed, usually after the publication of the paper.
This section requires authors to declare any interests that could compromise the objectivity or validity of the research.
This acknowledges any financial support received for the research, specifying the roles of the funders.
This section clarifies each author's role in the research and manuscript preparation.
This section gives credit to those who contributed to the research but are not listed as authors.
This part may provide additional information about the authors, such as academic affiliations and professional roles.
These are additional comments or clarifications that are relevant but not critical enough to include in the main text.
This lists all the sources cited in the paper, formatted according to a specific citation style like NLM.
This sub-section within the references includes web-based sources with proper citation formats.
This provides an example of how to format citations, helping authors to maintain consistency.
This relates to all visual and tabular data, and any additional files like supplementary data or research protocols.
This is the final step, where the completed manuscript is uploaded to the journal's submission system for review.