For your Opinion or Commentary article to be accepted for publication in IgMin Research – STEM, a multidisciplinary journal, there are specific criteria that your manuscript must meet. Here, we will break down these criteria by sub-types of articles within the Opinion or Commentary category: Editorials, Guest Commentaries, and Expert Opinions.
Editorials are generally written by members of the editorial board or invited guest editors. They provide an overview of the contents of the journal issue, comment on topical events, or introduce novel ideas or perspectives.
Guest Commentaries may cover a wide range of subjects, including policy recommendations, new methodologies, or interpretations of research findings within the STEM domain.
Expert Opinions offer deep insights into very specific topics, providing the reader with an in-depth understanding of the subject matter based on the expertise of the author.
The credibility and overall quality of any academic journal depend heavily on the strict adherence to standardized reporting guidelines. At IgMin Research – STEM, we emphasize the importance of maintaining high ethical standards and robust scientific rigor. In this context, it is crucial for authors to align their submissions with internationally recognized guidelines. Specifically, for Opinion and Commentary Articles—such as Editorials, Guest Commentaries, and Expert Opinions—the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) offers a comprehensive set of guidelines. Below we elaborate on various elements and how they should be adhered to for a submission to be considered.
Standardization is not merely a box-ticking exercise. It serves as a quality control mechanism, ensuring that every article meets specific quality benchmarks. For Opinion and Commentary Articles, this is particularly essential as these pieces often shape perceptions and inform future research. Standardization guarantees a uniform presentation of data, a transparent methodological approach, and an unbiased narrative, thereby building trust among readers and increasing the article's impact.
The ICMJE guidelines serve as a comprehensive framework for ensuring quality and transparency in biomedical journals, but their tenets are generally applicable to a broad range of scientific disciplines including STEM. They cover aspects such as manuscript preparation, ethical considerations, and data sharing protocols, among others.
The different types of Opinion and Commentary Articles should align their core sections with the general principles outlined by the ICMJE. Below are some key considerations for each article type:
It's essential to specify if your article requires ethical clearance. Typically, ethical clearance is a requisite for research involving human or animal subjects, but in the realm of Opinion and Commentary, it's equally important to maintain ethical rigor, especially when discussing case studies, patients, or sensitive data.
Even though Opinion and Commentary Articles are often invited submissions, the peer-review process still applies, following ICMJE guidelines. This process adds an additional layer of scrutiny, helping to uphold the journal's quality and reputation.
If your article includes supplementary materials like datasets, questionnaires, or additional documentation, ensure they meet the ICMJE guidelines for transparency and accessibility.
Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest as stipulated by the ICMJE guidelines. Transparency in this regard helps to maintain the integrity of the article and the journal.
According to ICMJE guidelines, all articles, including Opinion and Commentary, should be subjected to a plagiarism check to ensure the originality of the content.
Once the manuscript undergoes peer review, authors might be asked to make revisions. The ICMJE guidelines provide a framework for how revisions should be carried out and submitted for re-review.
While it may appear cumbersome to adhere to a multitude of guidelines, the payoff in terms of the article's credibility and overall quality is invaluable. A well-structured, ethically sound, and methodologically rigorous article adds not only to the authors' reputations but also enhances the standing of the journal. Therefore, compliance with ICMJE guidelines—or any other internationally recognized standards—is not just a requirement but a marker of excellence in scholarly publishing.
In summary, aligning with the ICMJE guidelines is imperative for ensuring that your Opinion and Commentary Article meets the rigorous scientific, ethical, and methodological standards that readers of IgMin Research – STEM expect. Given the influential nature of these articles, this alignment is not merely a formality but a critical step in scholarly communication. Following these guidelines closely will ensure the highest chance of your manuscript being accepted for publication.
The structural integrity of a manuscript, particularly in the realm of opinion or commentary articles, is of critical importance. This ensures that the narrative thread runs coherently, enabling the reader to follow your argument with ease. Here, we delve deeper into the backbone structure and word limits for each sub-type of opinion or commentary articles: Editorials, Guest Commentaries, and Expert Opinions.
Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for the topic under discussion. It serves as a brief snapshot that conveys the essence and purpose of the editorial. It must captivate the reader's attention and build a foundation for the arguments that will follow.
Body: This is the heart of the editorial where the crux of your arguments will reside. The body should flow logically and each paragraph should serve a distinct purpose.
Conclusion: The conclusion serves to summarize the key points made in the body, leaving the reader with a clear takeaway.
Overall Word Limit for Editorials: 800-1000 words
Introduction: Similar to editorials, the introduction in a guest commentary needs to outline the topic and its relevance succinctly. However, there is often more latitude to include personal experiences or observations.
Background: This section provides additional context and builds a solid foundation for the commentary.
Argument: The core section where you present your viewpoint and back it up with evidence.
Conclusion: Wrap up your commentary by summarizing your points and explaining the broader implications.
Overall Word Limit for Guest Commentaries: 1000-1500 words
Introduction: Expert Opinions allow for a deep dive into a niche topic. The introduction should indicate why the expert’s viewpoint is vital.
Background: Lay the groundwork by reviewing existing knowledge and debates in the field.
Opinion: This section is the crux of the article and should be the longest. Here, you share your unique insights and substantiate them.
Conclusion: Like the other article types, the conclusion brings together your primary points and suggests next steps or calls to action.
Overall Word Limit for Expert Opinions: 1200-2000 words
In all these article types, the word limits serve as guidelines rather than strict rules. They aim to ensure conciseness while providing ample room for depth and nuance. Adhering to these structures and word limits is likely to make your manuscript more compelling and easier to follow, thereby enhancing its impact and reach.
Keep in mind that the more concise and straightforward your article, the more accessible it will be to a broad audience. This is particularly crucial for opinion or commentary pieces, which often aim to spark conversation or instigate change. Well-structured arguments and clear language can make your work more influential, resonating not just within your field but also in broader academic and public spheres.
Overall, the structure and word limit requirements serve as a practical roadmap for constructing an engaging and impactful article. Following these guidelines will aid in streamlining the editorial process and will increase the likelihood of your manuscript being accepted for publication in IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal.
Effective formatting is crucial for streamlining the pagination process, ensuring consistent appearance across different articles, and facilitating a smoother peer-review process. In this comprehensive guide, we will delve into the key aspects that authors should consider when formatting their Opinion or Commentary Articles for submission to IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal.
Start with an 8.5 x 11-inch page setting (U.S. letter size) in your word processor. Ensure that the margins are set at 1 inch (2.54 cm) on all sides. This standard size is crucial as it is universally accepted for scientific journals and helps in the easy alignment of text and figures during the pagination process.
1. Text alignment and indentation: The text should be aligned to the "justified" setting. The first line of each new paragraph should be indented by 0.5 inches. Never use the space bar to align text; always use the tab key or the paragraph settings in your word processor.
2. Page numbering and running headers: Page numbers should be placed at the bottom-center of each page. A running header featuring a shortened version of the article title can also be included at the top of each page, aligned to the right. This helps in easier navigation and organization during the review process.
The standard font for the manuscript text should be 12-point Times New Roman. This is because it's universally accepted and easy to read.
1. Subheadings and special sections: Subheadings should be in bold and start at the left margin. Special sections like ‘Acknowledgments’ and ‘References’ should also be bolded and centered on the page.
2. Special characters and equations: For any special characters or equations, use the ‘Insert’ function of your word processor to ensure they are clearly rendered. If specific styling is required for subscripts or superscripts, make sure they are consistently applied throughout the manuscript.
3. Spacing and paragraphs: The entire manuscript should be double-spaced. This is not just for the text but extends to the references, figure legends, and tables. Double spacing ensures that there is enough room for markers and reviewers to make annotations.
4. Between sections and subsections: Leave a blank line between sections and subsections to clearly demarcate them.
Figures and tables should be incorporated within the text at the points where they are referred to, rather than being grouped at the end of the manuscript.
1. Captioning and numbering: Every table and figure must have a caption and be sequentially numbered. The captions should offer enough information that the figure or table is understandable without needing to refer to the main text.
2. Image resolution and quality: Images should be submitted in high-resolution, with a minimum of 300 DPI for grayscale and 600 DPI for color images. This ensures that figures are clear and legible when printed.
3. Data tables: Tables should be created using the table function in the word processor to ensure that columns align correctly. Never use the tab key or space bar to create a table.
Follow the NLM style guide for references. All citations should be numbered consecutively and correspond to a numbered reference list at the end of the manuscript.
1. In-text citations: For in-text citations, use superscript numbers immediately after the punctuation mark that follows the cited material.
2. Reference list: The reference list should be double-spaced and each entry should have a hanging indent of 0.5 inches.
Any supplementary files, appendices, or additional data should be clearly labeled and referenced within the main manuscript text. Submit these as separate files but ensure they are also formatted according to the guidelines.
Before submission, ensure that all pages are correctly numbered and that all figures and tables are clearly labeled and of high quality. Double-check your citations and references to ensure they conform to the NLM style.
Though not mandatory, professional layout and typesetting software like Adobe InDesign or LaTeX can offer advanced formatting options and greater consistency. However, these require a learning curve and may not be necessary for simpler articles.
In summary, adherence to these detailed formatting guidelines will not only streamline the editorial process but also significantly increase your manuscript’s chances of being accepted. Through uniform formatting, we aim to create a coherent and visually pleasing reading experience for all our subscribers and members of the academic community. Thank you for considering IgMin Research – STEM for your scholarly contributions.
When it comes to publishing in an academic journal like IgMin Research – STEM, adhering to formatting guidelines is crucial. Proper formatting not only lends credibility to your work but also streamlines the editorial process, thereby facilitating a quicker review and publishing timeline. Below are elaborate guidelines that authors must adhere to when formatting their Opinion or Commentary articles.
1. Choice of font: For consistency and readability, all manuscripts should be typed in a 12-point Times New Roman font. This standard font is universally recognized and easily accessible on most word processors, ensuring your document is viewed the same way across different platforms.
2. Line spacing and margins: All text should be double-spaced to allow for easier reading and annotation during the review process. Margins should be set at 1-inch on all sides. Do not justify the right margin; use a flush-left style.
3. Paragraphs and indentation: Each new paragraph should be indented by 0.5 inches. Do not add extra spaces between paragraphs. In Microsoft Word, this can be set up in the "Paragraph" settings under the "Layout" or "Page Layout" tab.
4. Headings and subheadings: Use clear and concise headings and subheadings to guide the reader through the document. For differentiation, headings can be bolded, while subheadings can be italicized. Make sure to number them sequentially (1, 1.1, 1.1.1 etc.) for ease of navigation.
1. Formats and resolution: Figures should be submitted in high-resolution JPEG or PNG format. Aim for a resolution of at least 300 DPI to ensure quality isn't lost during the publication process.
2. Placement and labels: Figures must be incorporated into the text at the points where they are referenced. Each figure should be numbered consecutively and have a descriptive caption placed below the figure.
3. Copyright and permission: Ensure that all figures are either your own or that you have obtained the appropriate permissions to use them. Any copyrighted material must be acknowledged, and permissions should be listed in the acknowledgements section.
1. Table preparation: Tables should be prepared using the table function in your word processor. Avoid using tabs or spaces to mimic the appearance of a table as this can lead to formatting issues during production.
2. Numbering and titles: Each table should be numbered consecutively and have a brief yet descriptive title. Titles should be placed above the table and formatted in the same 12-point Times New Roman font used for the text.
3. Table footnotes: Any explanatory footnotes should be placed immediately below the table, differentiated by superscripted lowercase alphabetic characters (a, b, c, etc.).
1. Types of files: Supplementary information, such as extended data sets, video clips, or additional explanations, can be submitted as separate files in commonly used formats like PDF, Excel, or MP4.
2. Labelling and linking: Ensure each supplementary file is labeled clearly to indicate its contents and relevance to the main manuscript. Directly reference these files within the manuscript to guide the reader.
3. Quality and presentation: Supplementary files should maintain a high standard of quality consistent with the main manuscript. Any variations in quality between the main manuscript and supplementary materials can detract from the overall presentation of your work.
1. Consistency: Maintain a consistent style throughout the manuscript. For instance, if you choose to write out numbers one through nine and use numerals for 10 and above, this rule should be applied consistently throughout the article.
2. Spell check and grammar: Before submitting, run a spell check and, if possible, have a colleague review the document for grammatical errors.
3. Proofreading: Ensure you carefully proofread your manuscript multiple times. This will help you catch errors that automated spell checks may miss and allow you to improve the flow and structure of your document.
4. Versioning: Always keep multiple backups and versions of your manuscript. Name your files clearly to avoid confusion and potential loss of work due to accidental overwrites.
By adhering to these meticulous formatting guidelines, authors ensure that the focus remains on the quality and impact of their scholarly contributions. This attention to detail will significantly aid in the smooth progression of your manuscript through the editorial review process, ultimately helping you share your insights and expertise with the global scientific community more efficiently.
Remember that failure to abide by these guidelines could result in delays in the processing of your manuscript or even its outright rejection. Therefore, it's vital to adhere to these guidelines as closely as possible for the best chances of having your article published in IgMin Research – STEM.
The old saying, "A picture is worth a thousand words," holds true even in the context of scholarly publications. Images can not only make your manuscript more appealing but can also aid in understanding complex concepts, making data easier to digest, or enhancing your argument or commentary.
Copyright issues can be a significant barrier in academic publishing. Using copyrighted pictures without permission can lead to legal repercussions and ethical questions, jeopardizing the credibility of both the author and the journal. Hence, opting for non-copyrighted pictures is a prudent choice to mitigate these risks.
There are multiple platforms offering non-copyrighted images for academic use, such as:
Remember to check the licensing of each photo to ensure that you have the rights to use it in an academic publication.
Make sure that your pictures are accessible to all, including people with visual impairments. Alt-text descriptions can be extremely useful for this purpose.
There are many software options like Adobe Photoshop, GIMP, and Canva that offer editing tools to tweak your chosen pictures so they better fit the context and aesthetics of your article.
Incorporating non-copyrighted pictures can substantially improve the impact and readability of your Opinion or Commentary article. While pictures can serve as powerful tools to reinforce your textual narrative, due diligence must be exercised to ensure that they are sourced and utilized ethically and legally.
By following this comprehensive guide, you should be well-equipped to enhance your article visually while adhering to the ethical and legal standards of academic publishing.
One of the most crucial aspects that authors should pay attention to is the originality of their work. The submitted articles must not be previously published elsewhere or under consideration for publication by another journal. Plagiarism, even when unintentional, could lead to immediate rejection. Therefore, authors must properly cite all external sources and obtain permissions for using any copyrighted material.
Another crucial consideration is adhering to ethical guidelines, particularly when your opinion or commentary discusses original research, human subjects, or clinical trials.
The objective of an opinion or commentary piece is often to shed new light on, or introduce a unique perspective to, a topic. However, the opinions presented must be backed by logical reasoning and, where possible, empirical evidence.
Ignoring the prescribed style guide and formatting instructions is a common reason for manuscript rejection.
It is vital to cite your sources correctly. Wrong citations not only mislead your readers but also affect the credibility of your article and the journal.
While these are generally optional in opinion or commentary articles, they can enhance your article's impact. However, these should not be inserted without purpose. Each figure or table should complement the text, not just repeat what has already been said.
Before submission, get feedback from colleagues who are experts in the field. Their insights can be invaluable for improving the quality of your article.
Always refer to the checklist provided by the journal. It is easy to overlook minor but essential elements of the submission process, and the checklist serves as a final verification step.
Failing to adhere to these guidelines could result in a range of negative outcomes, from delays in the review process to outright rejection.
In summary, the precautions and cautions outlined here are not mere formalities but crucial steps designed to ensure the quality and integrity of both your article and the journal. Adhering to these guidelines will facilitate a smoother review process and enhance the credibility and impact of your published work.
Text formatting plays an integral role in ensuring the readability and professional presentation of your article. Below we break down several important components that need your attention when preparing a manuscript for Opinion or Commentary articles to be published in IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal.
By adhering to these detailed formatting guidelines, you enhance the integrity, readability, and overall quality of your manuscript. Proper text formatting is not just a requirement but a critical element that contributes to the dissemination and impact of your scholarly work in the scientific community. Therefore, we highly encourage all authors to pay close attention to these guidelines before submitting their manuscripts to IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal.
We understand that preparing a manuscript for submission to a scientific journal can be an intricate and time-consuming process. To facilitate this, we at IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal offer a comprehensive set of article preparatory guidelines. This detailed guide aims to assist you through every step of your writing and submission process, ensuring that your manuscript not only meets our rigorous editorial standards but also maximizes its impact within the scientific community.
Before you even begin writing, it is crucial to understand the scope and focus of our journal. IgMin Research – STEM is a multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Please review past issues and articles to ensure that your topic fits within our scope. If your topic is aligned, not only is your manuscript more likely to be accepted, but it is also more likely to be read and cited by your peers.
Understanding your audience can significantly shape the tone, structure, and content of your manuscript. For our journal, the primary readership includes researchers, academicians, and professionals in the STEM field. Tailoring your article to meet their expectations can enhance its readability and impact.
IgMin Research – STEM accepts various article types, including Original Research, Reviews, Case Studies, and Opinion or Commentary Articles like Editorials, Guest Commentaries, and Expert Opinions. Each type has its requirements, so please consult our guidelines specific to the type of article you are submitting.
Conducting a thorough literature review serves multiple purposes: it provides a background against which you can position your study or opinion, identifies gaps in current knowledge, and may offer methodologies that you can adopt or adapt. By referring to a wide range of sources, you strengthen your article’s credibility.
Your title should be succinct while effectively conveying the essence of your research or opinion. A well-crafted title can attract more readers and facilitate better indexing in databases.
Similarly, your abstract should provide a concise summary of your work, including the problem you are addressing, your methodology, and your main findings or opinions. It should be structured well, ideally within 150 to 250 words.
For original research articles, a detailed methodology section is crucial as it lends credibility to your research. It should include the research design, sample size, data collection methods, and statistical tests used, among other elements.
How you present your data can greatly affect the impact of your findings. Make use of graphs, tables, and other illustrative elements. Additionally, take the time to interpret the data clearly and objectively in your text.
Maintaining ethical integrity is paramount. If your study involves human or animal subjects, you must provide details about ethics approval and consent.
While scientific rigor is vital, so too is the quality of your writing. Poorly structured sentences, grammatical errors, and unclear language can all detract from the impact of your article. We highly recommend that you have your manuscript reviewed by colleagues and, if possible, a professional editor.
All claims, statistics, and scientific facts should be appropriately cited using the NLM style. Proper citations not only provide credibility to your work but also help you avoid allegations of plagiarism.
Before submission, proofread your article carefully to weed out errors. You should also consider getting feedback from colleagues through informal peer reviews.
Before you hit that "submit" button, double-check that you have complied with all guidelines, and have all required documents like the covering letter, author statement form, and others. Make sure your files are named appropriately and that you have followed the prescribed file formats.
Once you've ensured all criteria are met, you can proceed to submit your manuscript through our online portal. After submission, you may be required to undertake revisions following peer review, which you must complete within the stipulated timeline.
Once your article has been reviewed, you may receive feedback that requires revisions. Treat this as an opportunity to enhance your manuscript. Address the comments point-by-point and provide a cover letter outlining the changes made.
After publication, your article’s impact can be gauged through various metrics like citation indices and Altmetrics. These metrics can provide valuable insights into the reach and influence of your work within the scientific community.
Post-publication, it's important to promote your work for greater visibility. Utilize social media, institutional repositories, and academic networking sites like ResearchGate and Academia.edu for this purpose.
Through this detailed guide, we aim to provide you with all the resources you'll need to prepare your manuscript effectively for submission to IgMin Research – STEM. Our goal is to make the submission process as straightforward as possible while maintaining the highest standards of scientific integrity and excellence. Thank you for considering our journal as a home for your scholarly contributions.
A well-prepared manuscript doesn't just include the primary text but also an assortment of supplemental documents that serve various functions, from stating the authors' roles to declaring any potential conflicts of interest. Here, we elaborate on each of the essential documents you must submit to ensure a smooth evaluation and publication process.
The covering letter serves as your first impression to the editorial team. It should:
The manuscript is, of course, the core of your submission. However, it should be supplemented with tables and panels that aid in the article's comprehension.
Figures serve to visually represent or summarize key points or data. Each figure should:
The Author Statement Form is a critical document where each author specifies their contributions to the manuscript. It helps to clarify roles and responsibilities and is essential for transparency. The form usually includes:
These declarations serve to maintain the integrity of the academic record.
In summary, the mandatory submission documents provide a comprehensive framework to evaluate the suitability and quality of a manuscript. Each of these components serves specific functions, contributing to a transparent, ethical, and rigorous scholarly publishing process.
By ensuring that each of these documents is meticulously prepared and adheres to the guidelines, you significantly enhance the likelihood of your manuscript not only being accepted for review but also being well-received by your peer community
Authorship is a critical aspect of scholarly communication, contributing significantly to the development and dissemination of scientific knowledge. At IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal, we maintain strict criteria for authorship, ensuring that individuals who have made substantive intellectual contributions to a paper are acknowledged and that ethical standards are upheld.
Traditionally, human authors have been the cornerstone of intellectual contributions to academic research. They contribute original research questions, design experiments, collect and analyze data, interpret results, and construct coherent arguments. As such, human authors bear responsibility for their work, including any errors or issues related to ethical considerations such as plagiarism, data falsification, or other forms of academic misconduct.
The emergence of large language models (LLMs)
LLMs like ChatGPT have become increasingly sophisticated, capable of generating coherent and contextually relevant text based on the data they've been trained on. They can assist in various tasks like data analysis, draft preparation, and even generating results sections. However, their role in academic publishing warrants scrutiny.
The main issue with considering LLMs as authors lies in the intellectual contributions and accountability aspects. LLMs do not possess the capability for original thought, ethical considerations, or the ability to take responsibility for errors or implications of the research. They are tools that are programmed to assist, not to think independently or ethically.
From an ethical standpoint, the use of LLMs in research can raise multiple concerns, such as data privacy, source transparency, and the potential for perpetuating bias. Human authors are required to declare conflicts of interest, sources of funding, and ethical compliance, aspects that LLMs cannot comprehend or declare.
LLMs have limitations in understanding the nuances of human language and the complexities of scientific research. Their understanding is limited to the data they were trained on and the algorithms that power them. They are not capable of handling the dynamic and evolving nature of scientific discourse.
Within the academic community, the idea of LLMs as authors could be seen as diminishing the value of human intellectual contributions. It could set a precedent that might devalue the rigorous methodology and ethical considerations that are fundamental to scholarly work.
As technology evolves, there may come a time when AI could make substantive intellectual contributions to research. However, we are not at that stage yet. Should we reach that point, a thorough re-evaluation of authorship criteria would be warranted, involving extensive discussions within the academic community.
Given the current limitations and ethical considerations, LLMs like ChatGPT do not meet the authorship criteria set by IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal. They can serve as valuable tools for assisting in research but cannot replace the intellectual contributions, ethical considerations, and responsibilities that come with human authorship.
Authors submitting to IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal must acknowledge that no part of their submission has been generated by LLMs in a manner that would warrant authorship. They must also ensure that all human authors meet the criteria for authorship as outlined by the journal.
While LLMs are powerful tools that can assist researchers in various ways, they currently do not meet the requirements for authorship as they cannot make intellectual contributions or bear ethical responsibilities. Their role, for the time being, should be considered supplementary to the human-driven research process.
By outlining these various dimensions, this expanded discussion aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of why Large Language Models like ChatGPT do not currently satisfy the authorship criteria for submissions to IgMin Research – STEM | A Multidisciplinary Journal. It reflects the journal's commitment to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical responsibility.
The process of preparing and submitting a manuscript involves multiple steps and adherences to standards. In this expanded section, we'll delve into each category to provide comprehensive guidance for prospective authors. This section aims to provide detailed clarification, allowing authors to be meticulous in their manuscript preparation for "Opinion or Commentary" articles.
Before you initiate the submission process, be aware of the criteria or standards that your article must meet. Your manuscript should align with the highest ethical and academic standards, following the guidelines specified by international committees like the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). This includes but is not limited to, the originality of work, the accuracy of data, the validity of interpretation, and a robust ethical standpoint.
The organization of your article is paramount to its readability and impact. Here are the components that need special attention:
Statements are official declarations that may be required to validate the ethical, methodological, and financial aspects of your article.
Use footnotes sparingly to provide additional information or clarification that does not fit naturally into the text body.
Graphics, tables, additional files (figures, tables, and additional files)
If your article includes any additional media like figures or tables, they should be high-resolution and appropriately labeled and cited within the text.
Once you've diligently followed all the guidelines, proceed to finalize your submission via the IgMin Research – STEM online portal. Ensure that all mandatory documents, including the covering letter, author statement form, and declaration of interests, are attached.
By following these comprehensive guidelines, you can improve the quality and readability of your manuscript, thereby increasing its chance of being accepted for publication in IgMin Research – STEM. Thank you for your valuable contributions to the scholarly community.