Help ?

IGMIN: あなたがここにいてくれて嬉しいです. お願いクリック '新しいクエリを作成してください' 当ウェブサイトへの初めてのご訪問で、さらに情報が必要な場合は.

すでに私たちのネットワークのメンバーで、すでに提出した質問に関する進展を追跡する必要がある場合は, クリック '私のクエリに連れて行ってください.'

Engineering

Engineering Optimization at IgMin Research | Engineering Group

私たちの使命は、学際的な対話を促進し、広範な科学領域にわたる知識の進展を加速することです.

About

In the ever-evolving landscape of engineering, the quest for efficiency, effectiveness, and innovation drives the field of Engineering Optimization. This multidisciplinary domain harnesses mathematical techniques, computational tools, and advanced algorithms to enhance the design, analysis, and operation of complex systems. With a focus on achieving optimal solutions that fulfill a variety of constraints and objectives, Engineering Optimization stands as a pivotal discipline that shapes industries and scientific advancements alike.

Engineering Optimization spans a wide array of applications and sub-disciplines. Here are 25 scopes within this dynamic field:

  • Mathematical Programming
  • Evolutionary Algorithms
  • Genetic Optimization
  • Swarm Intelligence
  • Multi-Objective Optimization
  • Robust Design Optimization
  • Structural Optimization
  • Process Optimization
  • Topology Optimization
  • Heuristic Optimization
  • Metaheuristic Optimization
  • Simulation-based Optimization
  • Reliability-based Optimization
  • Shape Optimization
  • Design of Experiments
  • Uncertainty Quantification
  • Surrogate Modeling
  • Constraint Handling Techniques
  • Sensitivity Analysis
  • Pareto Optimization
  • Decision Optimization
  • Optimization in Manufacturing
  • Energy System Optimization
  • Optimization in Aerospace Engineering
  • Optimization in Biomedical Engineering

Engineering Group (1)

Review Article Article ID: igmin232
Cite

Open Access Policy refers to a set of principles and guidelines aimed at providing unrestricted access to scholarly research and literature. It promotes the free availability and unrestricted use of research outputs, enabling researchers, students, and the general public to access, read, download, and distribute scholarly articles without financial or legal barriers. In this response, I will provide you with an overview of the history and latest resolutions related to Open Access Policy.

Mars Ascent Propellants and Life Support Resources - Take it or Make it?
by Donald Rapp

Studies of Mars missions over the past thirty years lacked credible cost estimates, so the total mass of materiel delivered to Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) was typically used as a rough measure of relative mission cost because the complexity of the mission was thought to be roughly proportional to the initial mass in LEO (IMLEO). Historically, high launch costs led to large investments in space hardware development which led to high space mission costs. Reducing mass became the central theme of space mission engineering. We are now entering a new era ...where launch costs no longer have the impact that they would have two decades ago. Launch costs are coming down to the point where we must ask ourselves whether it now makes sense to bring ascent propellants and life support resources from Earth (with higher reliability as a bonus), as opposed to using in situ propellant production and cycling of life support resources.This paper compares various options for bringing ascent propellants and life support resources from Earth vs. developing in situ. In short, it examines the “take it or make it” options for both technologies. For ISPP, the answer is clear: Mars ISPP is not worth the investment when launch costs are low. For life support, the most robust option is to bring life survival resources from Earth, and only use cycling to upgrade the quality of life for the crew.

Applied Engineering Engineering Optimization