Help ?

IGMIN: あなたがここにいてくれて嬉しいです. お願いクリック '新しいクエリを作成してください' 当ウェブサイトへの初めてのご訪問で、さらに情報が必要な場合は.

すでに私たちのネットワークのメンバーで、すでに提出した質問に関する進展を追跡する必要がある場合は, クリック '私のクエリに連れて行ってください.'

Hematology Physiology Antivirology Surgery Psychiatry Pediatrics Biochemistry Robotics Rare Disorders Vaccines Brain Disorders Emergency Medicine Mycology Taxonomy Computer Engineering Clinical Medicine Invitro Fertilization Biological Oceanography Physics Ecohydrology
    

Focusing on Biology, Medicine and Engineering ISSN: 2995-8067 | Quick Google Scholar

Search
Organised by  IgMin Fevicon
Submit Manuscript

Subjects/Topics

Welcome to IgMin Research – an Open Access journal uniting Biology Group, Medicine Group, and Engineering Group. We’re dedicated to advancing global knowledge and fostering collaboration across scientific fields.

Biology Group
Medicine Group
Engineering Group
General Science Group
A to Z Topics

Members

We are dedicated to advancing research by promoting dialogue between diverse scientific communities.

Editors
Authors
Submit Manuscript

Articles

We are dedicated to advancing research by promoting dialogue between diverse scientific communities.

Early Online
Current Issue
Previous Issue
Archive
Browse by Universities
Table of Content

Explore Content

We are dedicated to advancing research by promoting dialogue between diverse scientific communities.

Identify Us

Publish Now

Policies

Manuscript Guidelines

Other Services

Identify Us

We are dedicated to advancing research by promoting dialogue between diverse scientific communities.

About Us
Contact us
Testimonials
IgMin Corporation

Welcome to IgMin, a leading platform dedicated to enhancing knowledge dissemination and professional growth across multiple fields of science, technology, and the humanities. We believe in the power of open access, collaboration, and innovation. Our goal is to provide individuals and organizations with the tools they need to succeed in the global knowledge economy.

Publications Support
publications.support@igmin.org
E-Books Support
ebooks.support@igmin.org
Webinars & Conferences Support
webinarsandconference@igmin.org
Content Writing Support
contentwriting.support@igmin.org
IT Support
it.support@igmin.org
IgMin Youtube Link

Search

Explore Section

Content for the explore section slider goes here.

137 of 162
Atmospheric Fungal Spore Injection: A Promising Breakthrough for Challenging the Impacts of Climate Change Through Cloud Seeding and Weather Modification
Adam Ghebrezgiabher Ghebreyesus and Tedros Gebrezgiabhier Gebreyesus
139 of 162
Artificial Intelligence & the Capacity for Discrimination: The Imperative Need for Frameworks, Diverse Teams & Human Accountability
Destiny J Hunter
Abstract

要約 at IgMin Research

We are dedicated to advancing research by promoting dialogue between diverse scientific communities.

Biology Group Research Article 記事ID: igmin249

Efficacy of Alternative Insecticides against Dusky Cotton Bug (Oxycarenus laetus) to Improve Yield Losses in Cotton Crops through Residue-based Bioassay

Toxicology Ecosystem ResilienceBiochemistry DOI10.61927/igmin249
Muhammad Salman Hameed * 1 ,
Muhammad Arshad # 2 ,
Khurshied Ahmed Khan 3 and
Nida Urooj 4
Affiliation

Affiliation

    1State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, International Joint Research Center for Intelligent Biosensor Technology and Health, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, P.R. China

    2Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan

    3HATO Agriculture Lighting, National Science and Technology Park (NSTP), NUST, G405- 406, Islamabad, Pakistan

    4Department of Business Administration, Bahaudin Zakriya University, Multan, Pakistan

    5These Authors are Equally Contributed

Fulltext HTML Fulltext PDF Cite this article
60
REFERENCES
325
VIEWS
113
DOWNLOADS
93
Similar Articles
Connect with Us

要約

The study evaluates the efficacy of leufenuron, emamectin benzoate, and thiamethoxam against the Dusky Cotton Bug (Oxycarenus laetus Kirby) using residue-based bioassay methods. Key findings indicate that emamectin benzoate showed the highest efficacy with the lowest LC50 value, making it the most potent insecticide among those tested. Leufenuron and thiamethoxam followed, displaying moderate effectiveness. The results highlight the comparative advantages of emamectin benzoate in controlling Dusky Cotton Bug populations, suggesting its potential role in integrated pest management strategies. This study underscores the need for environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional insecticides in mitigating yield losses in cotton production.

数字

Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different neem treatments over time. This graph illustrates the mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug (Oxycarenus laetus) at 12, 24, 48, and 96-hour intervals after exposure to different concentrations of neem-based treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5). The results show that T1 and T5 consistently exhibited the highest mortality rates at each time point, with significant differences observed across all treatments (p < 0.05). The last two treatment groups in Figure 1B were marked with appropriate annotations to clearly distinguish the data. Figure 1: Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different...
Comparison of mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug at various time intervals for T1 and T5 Treatments. This figure illustrates the mortality rates (%) of Dusky Cotton Bug over four time intervals (12, 24, 48, and 96 hours) for treatments T1 and T5. T1 consistently demonstrated higher mortality rates across all time periods, with the maximum mortality observed after 96 hours. T5 showed relatively lower effectiveness compared to T1. The data highlight the time-dependent toxicity of the treatments, emphasizing the effectiveness of T1 in controlling the Dusky Cotton Bug population. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was observed at 24, 48, and 96-hour intervals. Figure 2: Comparison of mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug ...
Mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug at Various Tumma concentrations. The graph illustrates the concentration-mortality relationships of the Dusky Cotton Bug at different Tumma concentrations over 12, 24, 48, and 96 hours post-exposure. Statistical significance was observed across all concentrations (p < 0.0001) at each time interval. Figure 3: Mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug at Various Tum...
ABC shows the mortality rates of dusky cotton bugs at 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure to various Eucalyptus concentrations, revealing no significant differences at 12 hours but significant changes over time. Figure 4D displays the mortality rates after 96 hours, depicting significant differences among concentrations and notably increased mortality rates. Figure 4: ABC shows the mortality rates of dusky cotton bugs...
The relationship between different concentrations of Cypermethrin 10EC and the mortality rates of dusky cotton bugs observed at 12, 24, 48, and 96 hours post-application. The distinct trends in mortality rates among concentrations over the specified time intervals are visually represented in this comprehensive illustration. Figure 5: The relationship between different concentrations ...
Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different neem treatments over time. This graph illustrates the mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug (Oxycarenus laetus) at 12, 24, 48, and 96-hour intervals after exposure to different concentrations of neem-based treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5). The results show that T1 and T5 consistently exhibited the highest mortality rates at each time point, with significant differences observed across all treatments (p < 0.05). The last two treatment groups in Figure 1B were marked with appropriate annotations to clearly distinguish the data. Figure 1: Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different...
Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different neem treatments over time. This graph illustrates the mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug (Oxycarenus laetus) at 12, 24, 48, and 96-hour intervals after exposure to different concentrations of neem-based treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5). The results show that T1 and T5 consistently exhibited the highest mortality rates at each time point, with significant differences observed across all treatments (p < 0.05). The last two treatment groups in Figure 1B were marked with appropriate annotations to clearly distinguish the data. Figure 1: Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different...
Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different neem treatments over time. This graph illustrates the mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug (Oxycarenus laetus) at 12, 24, 48, and 96-hour intervals after exposure to different concentrations of neem-based treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5). The results show that T1 and T5 consistently exhibited the highest mortality rates at each time point, with significant differences observed across all treatments (p < 0.05). The last two treatment groups in Figure 1B were marked with appropriate annotations to clearly distinguish the data. Figure 1: Mortality rate of Dusky Cotton Bug under different...
Comparison of mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug at various time intervals for T1 and T5 Treatments. This figure illustrates the mortality rates (%) of Dusky Cotton Bug over four time intervals (12, 24, 48, and 96 hours) for treatments T1 and T5. T1 consistently demonstrated higher mortality rates across all time periods, with the maximum mortality observed after 96 hours. T5 showed relatively lower effectiveness compared to T1. The data highlight the time-dependent toxicity of the treatments, emphasizing the effectiveness of T1 in controlling the Dusky Cotton Bug population. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was observed at 24, 48, and 96-hour intervals. Figure 2: Comparison of mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug ...
Mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug at Various Tumma concentrations. The graph illustrates the concentration-mortality relationships of the Dusky Cotton Bug at different Tumma concentrations over 12, 24, 48, and 96 hours post-exposure. Statistical significance was observed across all concentrations (p < 0.0001) at each time interval. Figure 3: Mortality rates of Dusky Cotton Bug at Various Tum...
ABC shows the mortality rates of dusky cotton bugs at 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure to various Eucalyptus concentrations, revealing no significant differences at 12 hours but significant changes over time. Figure 4D displays the mortality rates after 96 hours, depicting significant differences among concentrations and notably increased mortality rates. Figure 4: ABC shows the mortality rates of dusky cotton bugs...
The relationship between different concentrations of Cypermethrin 10EC and the mortality rates of dusky cotton bugs observed at 12, 24, 48, and 96 hours post-application. The distinct trends in mortality rates among concentrations over the specified time intervals are visually represented in this comprehensive illustration. Figure 5: The relationship between different concentrations ...

参考文献

    1. Ali MA, Farooq J, Batool A, Zahoor A, Azeem F, Mahmood A, Jabran K. Cotton production in Pakistan. In: Cotton Production. 2019:249-76.
    2. Rehman A, Jingdong L, Chandio AA, Hussain I, Wagan SA, Memon QUA. Economic perspectives of cotton crop in Pakistan: A time series analysis (1970–2015) (Part 1). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2019;18:49-54.
    3. Shahzad K, Mubeen I, Zhang M, Zhang X, Wu J, Xing C. Progress and perspective on cotton breeding in Pakistan. J Cotton Res. 2022;5:1-17.
    4. Voora V, Larrea C, Bermudez S. Global market report: cotton. JSTOR; 2020.
    5. Khan MA, Wahid A, Ahmad M, Tahir MT, Ahmed M, Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M. World cotton production and consumption: An overview. In: Cotton Production and Uses: Agronomy, Crop Protection, and Postharvest Technologies. 2020:1-7.
    6. Niazi R, Nizami U. Cotton export potential: A case study of Pakistan. J Econ Sustain Dev. 2015;6:2222-1700.
    7. Wei W, Mushtaq Z, Ikram A, Faisal M, Wan-Li Z, Ahmad MI. Estimating the economic viability of cotton growers in Punjab Province, Pakistan. Sage Open. 2020;10:1-12.
    8. Malicha W, Njoroge L. Assessing the cotton, textile and apparel sector employment potential in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis; 2020.
    9. Fukunishi T, Yamagata T. Employment and wages in export-oriented garment industry: Recent trends in low-income countries under trade liberalization. Tokyo: Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO); 2013.
    10. Kabish AK. Textile and clothing production and trading—the way to industrial economy development. Ethiop J Sci Technol. 2023;16:1-12.
    11. Husain MD, Farooq S, Siddiqui MOR, Khan DR. Textile dynamics in Pakistan: Unraveling the threads of production, consumption, and global competitiveness. In: Consumption and Production in the Textile and Garment Industry: A Comparative Study Among Asian Countries. Springer; 2024:33-58.
    12. Sharma S, Kooner R, Arora R. Insect pests and crop losses. In: Breeding Insect Resistant Crops for Sustainable Agriculture. 2017:45-66.
    13. Bottrell DG, Adkisson PL. Cotton insect pest management. Annu Rev Entomol. 1977;22:451-81.
    14. Kaur R, Singh S, Kumar H, Pandher S, Kumar A. Next generation insect pest control in cotton: Current status, challenges and future perspectives. In: Cotton: Some Insights. 2023:1-82.
    15. Quan Y, Wu K. Managing Practical Resistance of Lepidopteran Pests to Bt Cotton in China. Insects. 2023 Feb 10;14(2):179. doi: 10.3390/insects14020179. PMID: 36835748; PMCID: PMC9965927.
    16. Tokel D, Dogan I, Hocaoglu-Ozyigit A, Ozyigit I.I. Cotton agriculture in Turkey and worldwide economic impacts of Turkish cotton. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19:10648-67.
    17. Ahmed R, Nadeem I, Yousaf MJ, Niaz T, Ali A, Ullah Z. Impact of dusky cotton bug (Oxycarenus laetus Kirby) on seed germination, lint color and seed weight in cotton crop. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2015;3:335-8.
    18. Hameed AH, Shahzad MS, Mehmood AM, Ahmad SA, Noor-ul-Islam N.-u.-I. Forecasting and modeling of sucking insect complex of cotton under agro-ecosystem of Multan-Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Agric Sci. 2014;51:1-7.
    19. Rajendran T, Birah A, Burange PS. Insect pests of cotton. In: Pests and Their Management. 2018:361-411.
    20. Mathangadeera RW, Hequet EF, Kelly B, Dever JK, Kelly CM. Importance of cotton fiber elongation in fiber processing. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;147:1-11.
    21. Javaid M, Naeem-Ullah U, Khan WS, Saeed S, Qayyum MA, Khan MA. Characterization of Azadirachta indica synthesized silver nanoparticles and its toxicity against dusky cotton bug, Oxycarenus hyalinipennis Costa (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2023;43:463-73.
    22. Razaq M, Mensah R, Athar HuR. Insect pest management in cotton. In: Cotton Production. 2019:85-107.
    23. Riaz S, Johnson JB, Ahmad M, Fitt GP, Naiker M. A review on biological interactions and management of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Appl Entomol. 2021;145:467-98.
    24. Morando R, da Silva IF, da Silva Santana A, Sampaio GSL, Lourenção AL, Baldin ELL. Assessing cotton genotypes for resistance to Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol. 2021;114:387-96.
    25. Abubakar M, Koul B, Chandrashekar K, Raut A, Yadav D. Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management strategies for sustainable agriculture: a review. Agriculture. 2022;12:1-10.
    26. Dhawan A. Integrated pest management in cotton. In: Integrated Pest Management in the Tropics. 2016:1-10.
    27. Zhang Z, Huang J, Yao Y, Peters G, Macdonald B, La Rosa AD, Wang Z, Scherer L. Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2023;4:703-15.
    28. Jha PK, Zhang N, Rijal JP, Parker LE, Ostoja S, Pathak TB. Climate change impacts on insect pests for high value specialty crops in California. Sci Total Environ. 2024;906:167605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167605. Epub 2023 Oct 5. PMID: 37802357.
    29. Nawaz A, Sufyan M, Gogi MD, Javed MW. Sustainable management of insect-pests. In: Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture. 2019:287-335.
    30. Campos EV, Proença PL, Oliveira JL, Bakshi M, Abhilash P, Fraceto LF. Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives. Ecol Indic. 2019;105:483-95.
    31. Muhammad A, Kashere M. Neem, Azadirachta indica L.(A. Juss): an eco-friendly botanical insecticide for managing farmers’ insects pest problems—a review. FUDMA J Sci. 2020;4:484-91.
    32. Aleksic Sabo V, Knezevic P. Antimicrobial activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis plant extracts and essential oils: A review. Ind Crops Prod. 2019 Jun;132:413-429. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.051. Epub 2019 Mar 5. PMID: 32288268; PMCID: PMC7126574.
    33. Dadé M, Zeinsteger P, Bozzolo F, Mestorino N. Repellent and Lethal Activities of Extracts From Fruits of Chinaberry (Melia azedarach, Meliaceae) Against Triatoma infestans. Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jul 26;5:158. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00158. PMID: 30094242; PMCID: PMC6070623.
    34. Ponsankar A, Sahayaraj K, Senthil-Nathan S, Vasantha-Srinivasan P, Karthi S, Thanigaivel A, Petchidurai G, Madasamy M, Hunter WB. Toxicity and developmental effect of cucurbitacin E from Citrullus colocynthis L. (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) against Spodoptera litura Fab. and a non-target earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(19):23390-23401. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04438-1. Epub 2019 Feb 8. PMID: 30734910.
    35. Ullah M, Ullah F, Khan MA, Ahmad S, Jamil M, Sardar S, Tariq K, Ahmed N. Efficacy of various natural plant extracts and the synthetic insecticide cypermethrin 25EC against Leucinodes orbonalis and their impact on natural enemies in brinjal crop. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2022;1-10.
    36. Malik SU, Zia K, Ajmal M, Shoukat RF, Li S, Saeed M, Zafar J, Shoukat RF. Comparative efficacy of different insecticides and estimation of yield losses on BT and non-BT cotton for thrips, red cotton bug, and dusky cotton bug. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2018;6:505-12.
    37. Nasir M, Asif MU, Shamraiz RM. Comparative efficacy of different insecticides against dusky cotton bug (Oxycarenus spp.) under field conditions. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;6:125-8.
    38. Saeed R, Abbas N, Hafez AM. Fitness cost of imidacloprid resistance in the cotton-staining bug, Dysdercus koenigii. Chemosphere. 2021 Feb;265:129118. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129118. Epub 2020 Nov 26. PMID: 33280850.
    39. Mohammadali MT, Alyousuf AA, Baqir HA, Kadhim AA. Evaluation of the efficacy of different Neocontinoid insecticides against cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on eggplant under greenhouse condition. Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; 2019.
    40. Zhang L, Greenberg SM, Zhang Y, Liu TX. Effectiveness of thiamethoxam and imidacloprid seed treatments against Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on cotton. Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Feb;67(2):226-32. doi: 10.1002/ps.2056. PMID: 21077123.
    41. Basit M. Cotton pest control awareness in farmers of the Punjab, Pakistan and its impact on whitefly resistance against available insecticides. Phytoparasitica. 2018;46:183-95.
    42. Dennehy TJ, DeGain BA, Harpold VS, Brown JK, Morin S, Fabrick JA, Byrne FJ, Nichols RL. New challenges to management of whitefly resistance to insecticides in Arizona. Vegetable Report. 2005;1-28.
    43. Arshad MU, Zhao Y, Hanif O, Fatima F. Evolution of overall cotton production and its determinants: Implications for developing countries using Pakistan case. Sustainability. 2022;14:1-17.
    44. Barathi S, Sabapathi N, Kandasamy S, Lee J. Present status of insecticide impacts and eco-friendly approaches for remediation-a review. Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 1):117432. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117432. Epub 2023 Oct 20. PMID: 37865327.
    45. Ch KM, Ashraf S, Ashraf I. Cotton production trends in Pakistan: An integrative review. J Plant Environ. 2021;3:147-58.
    46. Constable G, Llewellyn D, Walford SA, Clement JD. Cotton breeding for fiber quality improvement. In: Industrial crops: Breeding for Bioenergy and Bioproducts. 2015:191-232.
    47. Dai J, Dong H. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Res. 2014;155:99-110.
    48. Dhuldhaj UP, Singh R, Singh VK. Pesticide contamination in agro-ecosystems: toxicity, impacts, and bio-based management strategies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):9243-9270. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24381-y. Epub 2022 Dec 2. PMID: 36456675.
    49. Feike T, Khor LY, Mamitimin Y, Ha N, Li L, Abdusalih N, Xiao H, Doluschitz R. Determinants of cotton farmers’ irrigation water management in arid Northwestern China. Agric Water Manag. 2017;187:1-10.
    50. Karlsson Green K, Stenberg JA, Lankinen Å. Making sense of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in the light of evolution. Evol Appl. 2020 Aug 20;13(8):1791-1805. doi: 10.1111/eva.13067. PMID: 32908586; PMCID: PMC7463341.
    51. Khan BA, Nadeem MA, Nawaz H, Amin MM, Abbasi GH, Nadeem M, Ali M, Ameen M, Javaid MM, Maqbool R. Pesticides: impacts on agriculture productivity, environment, and management strategies. In: Emerging Contaminants and Plants: Interactions, Adaptations and Remediation Technologies. Springer; 2023;109-34.
    52. Lamichhane JR, Aubertot J-N, Begg G, Birch ANE, Boonekamp P, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S, Hansen JG, Hovmøller MS, Jensen JE, Jørgensen LN. Networking of integrated pest management: A powerful approach to address common challenges in agriculture. Crop Prot. 2016;89:139-51.
    53. Lishchuk A, Parfenyk A, Horodyska I, Boroday V, Ternovyi Y, Tymoshenko L. Environmental risks of the pesticide use in agrocenoses and their management. J Ecol Eng. 2023;24:199-212.
    54. Masroor A, Ashraf MR, Javed K, Ahmad S, Khan SZ. Comparative study of different management practices for cotton cultivars against dusky cotton bug (Oxycarenus spp.). Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol. 2018;23:23-33.
    55. Matloob A, Aslam F, Rehman HU, Khaliq A, Ahmad S, Yasmeen A, Hussain N. Cotton-based cropping systems and their impacts on production. In: Cotton Production and Uses: Agronomy, Crop Protection, and Postharvest Technologies. 2020:283-310.
    56. Mithal Rind M, Sayed S, Ali Sahito H, Hussain Rind K, Ali Rind N, Hussain Shar A, Ullah H, Ondrisik P, Ivanic Porhajosova J, Guo Z, Shahen M. Effects of seasonal variation on the biology and morphology of the dusky cotton bug, Oxcarenus laetus(Kirby). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jun;28(6):3186-3192. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.065. Epub 2021 Mar 31. PMID: 34121854; PMCID: PMC8176047.
    57. Shahzad AN, Rizwan M, Asghar MG, Qureshi MK, Bukhari SAH, Kiran A, Wakeel A. Early maturing Bt cotton requires more potassium fertilizer under water deficiency to augment seed-cotton yield but not lint quality. Sci Rep. 2019 May 14;9(1):7378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43563-2. PMID: 31089147; PMCID: PMC6517391.
    58. Song R, Zhang Y, Lu P, Wu J, Li QX, Song B. Status and Perspective on Green Pesticide Utilizations and Food Security. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2024 Jun;15(1):473-493. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034519. Epub 2024 Jun 20. PMID: 38134385.
    59. Stanisçuaski F, Ferreira-Dasilva CT, Mulinari F, Pires-Alves M, Carlini CR. Insecticidal effects of canatoxin on the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus peruvianus (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Toxicon. 2005 May;45(6):753-60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.01.014. PMID: 15804524.
    60. Yee J, Ferguson W. Cotton pest management strategies and related pesticide use and yield. J Prod Agric. 1999;12:618-23.
Page Navigation
タイトルと著者 要約 数字 参考文献 類似の記事 View PDF
研究を公開する

私たちは、科学、技術、工学、医学に関する幅広い種類の記事を編集上の偏見なく公開しています。

提出する

見る 原稿のガイドライン 追加 論文処理料

IgMin 科目を探索する
Biology Medicine Engineering General Science

現在トレンドになっている記事はどれですか？

トップ10の記事をクリック

クイックリンク

原稿を提出する
IgMinリサーチを購読する

発表された記事、号のリリース、ジャーナル活動の最新情報についてのお知らせを受け取るために、メールアドレスを入力してください。

研究論文
  1. The Influence of Low Pesticide Doses on Fusarium Molds
  2. Lifestyle and Well-being among Portuguese Firefighters
  3. Modeling of Cr3+ doped Cassiterite (SnO2) Single Crystals
  4. Application of Virtual Reality (VR) in Facility Management Competency-based Training (CBT) in the Era of Industrie 5.0
  5. A Study to Determine the Reason for Lower Pregnancy Rates in Younger Women with Diminished Oocyte Reserve-less Chance of Implanting vs. Fetal Demise
  6. Gaussian-Transform for the Dirac Wave Function and its Application to the Multicenter Molecular Integral Over Dirac Wave Functions for Solving the Molecular Matrix Dirac Equation
もっと読む
グーグルスカラー
welcome Image

Google Scholarは2004年11月にベータ版が発表され、幅広い学術領域を航海する学術ナビゲーターとして機能します。それは査読付きジャーナル、書籍、会議論文、論文、博士論文、プレプリント、要約、技術報告書、裁判所の意見、特許をカバーしています。 IgMin の記事を検索