Help ?

IGMIN: あなたがここにいてくれて嬉しいです. お願いクリック '新しいクエリを作成してください' 当ウェブサイトへの初めてのご訪問で、さらに情報が必要な場合は.

すでに私たちのネットワークのメンバーで、すでに提出した質問に関する進展を追跡する必要がある場合は, クリック '私のクエリに連れて行ってください.'

Abstract

要約 at IgMin Research

私たちの使命は、学際的な対話を促進し、広範な科学領域にわたる知識の進展を加速することです.

Science Group Research Article Article ID: igmin229

The Influence of Dynamical Downscaling and Boundary Layer Selection on Egypt’s Potential Evapotranspiration using a Calibrated Version of the Hargreaves-samani Equation: RegCM4 Approach

Atmospheric Science Earth Science Affiliation

Affiliation

    Egyptian Meteorological Authority, Cairo, Egypt, P.O. 11784, Egypt

    Egyptian Meteorological Authority, Cairo, Egypt, P.O. 11784, Egypt

    WaterNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) is an important variable for monitoring daily agricultural activity as well as meteorological drought. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the influence of different options of the physical dynamical downscaling and boundary layer schemes on the simulated PET. Using the RegCM4 regional climate model, four simulations were conducted (two for each case) in the period 1997 to 2017. In all simulations, the RegCM4 was configured with 25 km resolution and downscaled by the ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset. To ensure a reliable estimation of the PET, a calibrated version of the Hargreaves-Samani equation was adopted. A high-resolution product of the ERA5 was used as the observational dataset. Results showed that the simulated PET is insensitive either to the dynamical downscaling or the boundary layer options. Concerning the annual climatological cycle, the RegCM4’s performance varies with month and location. Quantitatively, a root mean square error lies between 1 mm and 1.6 mm day-1, the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency between 0.2 and 0.6, and the coefficient of determination between 0.5 and 0.75. Additionally, the Linear Scaling (LS) method showed its added value in the evaluation/validation periods. In conclusion, the RegCM4 can be used to develop a regional PET map of Egypt using the LS either in the present climate or under different future scenarios.

Figures

References

    1. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. IPCC 2007. Technical report, IPCC.
    2. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, New York; 2014.
    3. Wilco T, Walter WI, Peter D. Climate change projections of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration for the Middle East and Northern Africa until 2050. Int J Climatol. 2013;33:3055-3072. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3650.
    4. Gurara MA, Jilo NB, Tolche AD. Impact of climate change on potential evapotranspiration and crop water requirement in Upper Wabe Bridge watershed, Wabe Shebele River Basin, Ethiopia. J Afr Earth Sci. 2021;180:104223.
    5. Allen RG, Smith M, Pereira LS, Perrier A. An update for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bulletin. 1994;43:35-92.
    6. Hamed MM, Iqbal Z, Nashwan MS, Kineber AF, Shahid S. Diminishing evapotranspiration paradox and its cause in the Middle East and North Africa. Atmos Res. 2023;289:106760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106760.
    7. Allen GR, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; Report 56; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy; 1998;300.
    8. Sperna Weiland FC, Tisseuil C, Dürr HH, Vrac M, van Beek LPH. Selecting the optimal method to calculate daily global reference potential evaporation from CFSR reanalysis data for application in a hydrological model study. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2012;16:983-1000. www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/983/2012.
    9. Murat C, Hatice C, Tefaruk H, Kisi O. Modifying Hargreaves-Samani equation with meteorological variables for estimation of reference evapotranspiration in Turkey. Hydrol Res. 2017;48(2):480-497. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.217.
    10. Hargreaves GL, Allen RG. History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J Irrigat Drain Eng. 2003;129:53-63.
    11. ElNesr MN, Alazba AA, Amin MT. Modified Hargreaves’ Method as an Alternative to the Penman-monteith Method in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5(6):1058-1069.
    12. Raziei T, Pereirab LS. Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran. Agric Water Manag. 2013;121:1-18.
    13. Kumari N, Srivastava A. An Approach for Estimation of Evapotranspiration by Standardizing Parsimonious Method. Agric Res. 2020;9:301-309.
    14. Incoom ABM, Adjei KA, Odai SN, Akpoti K, Siabi EK. Impacts of climate change on crop and irrigation water requirement in the Savannah regions of Ghana. J Water Clim Chang. 2022;13(9):3338-3356. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2022.129.
    15. Er-Raki S, Chehbouni A, Khabba S, Simonneaux V, Jarlan L, Ouldbba A, et al. Assessment of reference evapotranspiration methods in semi-arid regions: can weather forecast data be used as alternate of ground meteorological parameters? J Arid Environ. 2010;74(12):1587-1596.
    16. Li Z, Yang Y, Kan G, Hong Y. Study on the Applicability of the Hargreaves Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Method in CREST Distributed Hydrological Model (Version 3.0) Applications. Water. 2018;10:1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121882.
    17. Terink W, Immerzeel WW, Droogers P. Climate change projections of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration for the Middle East and Northern Africa until 2050. Int J Climatol. 2013;33:3055-3072. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3650.
    18. Anwar SA, Salah Z, Khaled W, Zakey AS. Projecting the Potential Evapotranspiration in Egypt Using a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model (RegCM4). Environ Sci Proc. 2022;19:43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12841.
    19. Elagib NA, Musa AA. Correcting Hargreaves-Samani formula using geographical coordinates and rainfall over different timescales. Hydrol Process. 2022;37. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14790.
    20. Srivastava A, Sahoo B, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R. Evaluation of variable-infiltration capacity model and MODIS-terra satellite-derived grid-scale evapotranspiration estimates in a River Basin with Tropical Monsoon-Type climatology. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2017;143(8):04017028.
    21. Srivastava A, Sahoo B, Raghuwanshi NS, Chatterjee C. Modelling the dynamics of evapotranspiration using Variable Infiltration Capacity model and regionally calibrated Hargreaves approach. Irrig Sci. 2018;36:289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0583-y.
    22. Spinoni J, Barbosa P, Bucchignani E. Global exposure of population and land-use to meteorological droughts under different warming levels and SSPs: A CORDEX-based study. Int J Climatol. 2021;41(15):6825-6853. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7302.
    23. Almorox J, Grieser J. Calibration of the Hargreaves–Samani method for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration in different Köppen climate classes. Hydrol Res. 2016;47(2):521-531. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2015.091.
    24. Giménez PO, García-Galiano SG. Assessing Regional Climate Models (RCMs) Ensemble-Driven Reference Evapotranspiration over Spain. Water. 2018;10(9):1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091181.
    25. Gurara MA, Jilo NB, Tolche AD. Impact of climate change on potential evapotranspiration and crop water requirement in Upper Wabe Bridge watershed, Wabe Shebele River Basin, Ethiopia. J Afr Earth Sci. 2021;180:104223.
    26. Raziei T, Pereirab LS. Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran. Agric Water Manag. 2013;121:1-18.
    27. Remrová M, Císlerová M. Analysis of Climate Change Effects on Evapotranspiration in the Watershed Uhlířská in the Jizera Mountains. Soil Water Res. 2010;5(1):28-38.
    28. Vahmani P, Jones AD, Li D. Will anthropogenic warming increase evapotranspiration? Examining irrigation water demand implications of climate change in California. Earth's Future. 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002221.
    29. Chen L, Huang G, Wang X. Projected changes in temperature, precipitation, and their extremes over China through the RegCM. Clim Dyn. 2019;53(9):5859-5880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04899-7.
    30. Xu X, Huang A, Huang Q. Impacts of the horizontal resolution of the lateral boundary conditions and downscaling method on the performance of RegCM4.6 in simulating the surface climate over central-eastern China. Earth Space Sci. 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002433..
    31. Anwar SA. Influence of Direct-Downscaling and One-Way Nesting on Daily Mean Air Temperature of Egypt Using the RegCM4. J Basic Res Eng Sci. 2023 Mar 09;4(3):338-347. doi:10.37871/jbres1681. Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1681.pdf.
    32. Ali MFA, Salah Z, Asklany SA, Hassan M, Harhash M, Wahab MMA. A Comparison of Three Boundary Layer Schemes for Numerical Weather Prediction. Appl Math Inf Sci. 2020;14(6):1093-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/140616.
    33. Holtslag AAM, Boville BA. Local versus nonlocal boundary layer diffusion in a global model. J Clim. 1993;6:1825-1842.
    34. Anwar SA, Mostafa SM. On the Sensitivity of the Daily Mean Air Temperature of Egypt to Boundary Layer Schemes Using a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model (RegCM4). J Basic Res Eng Sci. 2023 Mar 22;4(3):474-484. doi:10.37871/jbres1700. Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1700.pdf.
    35. Grenier H, Bretherton CS. A moist PBL parameterization for large scale models and its application to subtropical cloud-topped marine boundary layers. Mon Weather Rev. 2001;129:357-377.
    36. Anwar SA, Lazić I. Estimating the Potential Evapotranspiration of Egypt Using a Regional Climate Model and a High-Resolution Reanalysis Dataset. Environ Sci Proc. 2023;25:29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-7-14253.
    37. Lafon T, Dadson S, Buys G, Prudhomme C. Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: A comparison of methods. Int J Climatol. 2013;33:1367-1381.
    38. El Kenawy A, Lopez-Moreno JI, Vicente-Serrano SM, Morsi F. Climatological modeling of monthly air temperature and precipitation in Egypt through GIS techniques. Clim Res. 2010;42:161-176.
    39. Nashwan MS, Shahid S. Symmetrical uncertainty and random forest for the evaluation of gridded precipitation and temperature data. Atmos Res. 2019;230:104632.
    40. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. Updated World Map of the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2007;11:1633-1644.
    41. Dickinson RE, Errico RM, Giorgi F, Bates GT. A regional climate model for the western United States. Clim Change. 1989;15:383-422.
    42. Giorgi F, Bates GT. The climatological skill of a regional model over complex terrain. Mon Wea Rev. 1989;117:2325-2347.
    43. Giorgi F. Thirty years of regional climate modeling. Where are we and where are we going? J Geophys Res. 2019;124:5696-5723.
    44. Giorgi F, Marinucci MR, Bates GT. Development of a second generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part I: Boundary layer and radiative transfer processes. Mon Wea Rev. 1993;121:2794-2813.
    45. Giorgi F, Marinucci MR, Bates GT, DeCanio G. Development of a second generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part II: Convective processes and assimilation of lateral boundary conditions. Mon Wea Rev. 1993;121:2814-2832.
    46. Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X, Elguindi N, Solmon F, Gao X, et al. The ICTP RegCM3 and RegCNET: Regional climate modeling for the developing World. Bull Amer Meteor Soc. 2007;88:1395-1409.
    47. Giorgi F, Coppola E, Solmon F, Mariotti L, Sylla MB, Bi X, et al. RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains. Clim Res. 2012;52:7-29.
    48. Giorgi F, Coppola E, Giuliani G, Ciarlo` JM, Pichelli E, Nogherotto R, et al. The Fifth Generation Regional Climate Modeling System, RegCM5: Description and Illustrative Examples at Parameterized Convection and Convection-Permitting Resolutions. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038199.
    49. Anwar SA, Malcheva K, Srivastava A. Estimating the potential evapotranspiration of Bulgaria using a high‑resolution regional climate model. Theor Appl Climatol. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04438-9.
    50. Anwar SA, Mamadou O, Diallo I, Sylla MB. On the influence of vegetation cover changes and vegetation-runoff systems on the simulated summer potential evapotranspiration of tropical Africa using RegCM4. Earth Syst Environ. 2021;5:883-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00252-3.
    51. Anwar SA, Diallo I. A RCM investigation of the influence of vegetation status and runoff scheme on the summer Gross Primary Production of Tropical Africa. Theor Appl Climatol. 2021;145:1407-1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03667-0.
    52. Anwar SA, Diallo I. Modelling the Tropical African Climate using a state-of-the-art coupled regional climate-vegetation model. Clim Dyn. 2022;58:97-113.
    53. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc. 2011;137:553-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828.
    54. Singer M, Asfaw D, Rosolem R, Cuthbert MO, Miralles DG, MacLeod D, et al. Michaelides K. Hourly potential evapotranspiration (hPET) at 0.1degs grid resolution for the global land surface from 1981-present. Sci Data. 2021;8:224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01003-9.
    55. Nashwan MS, Shahid S, Chung ES. High-Resolution Climate Projections for a Densely Populated Mediterranean Region. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093684.
    56. Mostafa SM, Anwar SA, Zakey AS, Wahab MMA. Bias-correcting the maximum and minimum air temperatures of Egypt using a high-resolution Regional Climate Model (RegCM4). Eng Proc. 2023;31:73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13852.
    57. Muñoz-Sabater J, Dutra E, Agustí-Panareda A, Albergel C, Arduini G, Balsamo G, et al. ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2021;13:4349-4383. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021.
    58. Harris I, Osborn TJ, Jones P, Lister D. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci Data. 2020 Apr 3;7(1):109. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3. PMID: 32246091; PMCID: PMC7125108.
    59. Kirch W. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient. In: Kirch W, ed. Encyclopedia of Public Health. Springer; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2569.
    60. Awal R, Rahman A, Fares A, Habibi H. Calibration and Evaluation of Empirical Methods to Estimate Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in West Texas. Water. 2022;14:3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193032.
    61. Ogunrinde AT, Emmanuel I, Enaboifo MA, Ajayi TA, Pham QB. Spatio-temporal calibration of Hargreaves-Samani model in the Northern Region of Nigeria. Theor Appl Climatol. 2022;147:1213-1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03897-2.

Similar Articles

DNA Genetics and UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS Analysis of Phytochemicals for Asparagus racemosus Roots
Nguyen Thi Huong, Do Ngoc Thuy, Phung Van Trung, Le Ngoc Hung and Mai Van Nam
DOI10.61927/igmin217
Kinetic Study of the Removal of Reafix Yellow B8G Dye by Boiler Ash
Peterson Filisbino Prinz, Mariane Hawerroth, Liliane Schier de Lima and Juliana Martins Teixeira de Abreu Pietrobelli
DOI10.61927/igmin127
Exploring Upper Limb Kinematics in Limited Vision Conditions: Preliminary Insights from 3D Motion Analysis and IMU Data
Artemis Zarkadoula, Themistoklis Tsatalas, George Bellis, Paris Papaggelos, Evangelia Vlahogianni, Stefanos Moustos, Eirini Koukourava and Dimitrios Tsaopoulos
DOI10.61927/igmin138
Qualitative Model of Electrical Conductivity of Irradiated Semiconductor
Temur Pagava, Levan Chkhartishvili, Manana Beridze, Darejan Khocholava, Marina Shogiradze and Ramaz Esiava
DOI10.61927/igmin166
Association and New Therapy Perspectives in Post-Stroke Aphasia with Hand Motor Dysfunction
Shuo Xu, Chengfang Liang, Shaofan Chen, Zhiming Huang and Haoqing Jiang
DOI10.61927/igmin141