Help ?

IGMIN: あなたがここにいてくれて嬉しいです. お願いクリック '新しいクエリを作成してください' 当ウェブサイトへの初めてのご訪問で、さらに情報が必要な場合は.

すでに私たちのネットワークのメンバーで、すでに提出した質問に関する進展を追跡する必要がある場合は, クリック '私のクエリに連れて行ってください.'

科学、技術、工学、医学(STEM)分野に焦点を当てています | ISSN: 2995-8067  G o o g l e  Scholar

logo image

IgMin Research | マルチディシプリナリーオープンアクセスジャーナルは、科学、技術、工学、医学(STEM)の広範な分野における研究と知識の進展に貢献することを目的とした権威ある多分野のジャーナルです.

Abstract

要約 at IgMin Research

私たちの使命は、学際的な対話を促進し、広範な科学領域にわたる知識の進展を加速することです.

Biology Group Short Communication 記事ID: igmin163

Comments to Megascopic Quantum Phenomena

Quantum Chemistry Physical ChemistryComputational Chemistry Affiliation

Affiliation

    CMOA Czech Branch, Carlsbad, Czech Republic

要約

We present here the incompleteness of the Copenhagen interpretation regarding the impossibility of explaining the transition from the exact quantum mechanics to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, where the inaccurate method captures phenomena like spontaneous symmetry breaking, but this is impossible to achieve with exact equations. The solution to this dilemma lies in the revision of quantum field theory which bounds together internal and external (vibrational, translational, and rotational) degrees of freedom in a similar way as the Lorentz transformation deals with space and time. This is the only way how to exactly mathematically justify the corrections beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (Born-Huang ansatz). The consequences are overwhelming: It reveals the wrong BCS theory of superconductivity, derived on the basis of the incomplete quantum field, and all erroneous theories inspired by the BCS one (e.g. Higgs mechanism). Moreover, the second Bohr complementarity emerges from the mechanical wholeness and field fragmentation, opening the door for the megascopic mirror of the microscopic Copenhagen interpretation and for the explanation of megascopic quantum phenomena. Finally, we get an entirely new look at the meaning of physics and chemistry: The first one deals with microscopic and the second one with megascopic phenomena.

参考文献

    1. Svrček M. Megascopic Quantum Phenomena: A Critical Study of Physical Interpretations. Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics. 2020; 32: 283-392. Springer, Cham Free copy available in arxiv.org/abs/2004.00978
    2. Bohr N. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1958.
    3. Born M, Oppenheimer R. Ann Phys. (Leipzig). 1927; 84: 457.
    4. Sutcliffe B, Woolley RG. Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics. 2013; 27: Part 1, 3-40.
    5. Jahn HA, Teller E. Stability of Polyatomic Molecules in Degenerate Electronic States. I. Orbital Degeneracy. Proc R Soc London A. 1937; 161: 220.
    6. Cafiero M, Adamowicz L. Molecular structure in non-Born-Oppenheimer quantum mechanics. Chem Phys Letters. 2004; 387: 136-141.
    7. Born M, Huang K. The Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices. Oxford University Press, London. 1954.
    8. Kutzelnigg W. The adiabatic approximation I. The physical background of the Born-Handy ansatz. Mol Phys. 1997; 90: 909.
    9. Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge Classics, London and New York. 1980.
    10. Jordan P. On the Process of Measurement in Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science. 1949; 16: 269-278.
    11. Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR. Theory of Superconductivity. Phys Rev. 1957; 108: 1175.
    12. Fröhlich H. Interaction of electrons with lattice vibrations. Proc R Soc Lond. 1952; A215: 291.
    13. Meissner W, Ochsenfeld R. A new effect when superconductivity occurs. Natural Sciences. 1933; 21(44): 787–788.
    14. Hirsch JE. The origin of the Meissner effect in new and old superconductors . Physica Scripta. 2012; 85: 035704.
    15. Goldstone J. Field theories with Superconductor solutions. New Challenge. 1961; 19: 154–164.
    16. Comay E. Inherent Contradictions in Higgs Boson Theory. American Journal of Modern Physics. 2015; 5:18-22.
    17. Higgs PW. Nobel Lecture: Evading the Goldstone theorem. Rev Mod Phys. 2014; 86: 851.
    18. Maxwell JC, Garber E, Brush SG, Everitt CWF. Maxwell on heat and statistical mechanics: On avoiding all personal enquiries of molecules, Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press. 1995.
    19. Collected Works of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, Mass. 1964; 45–46.
    20. van Fraassen BC. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
    21. Einstein A, de Haas WJ. Experimental proof of Ampere molecular currents. German Physical Society. Negotiations 1915; 17.
    22. Whyte LL. The Unconscious before Freud. Basic Books. New York. 1960.
    23. Beato G. Aurelius Occultae Philosophorum. In Theatrum Chemicum. Strasbourg: Zetzner. 1613; IV.
    24. Everett H. "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Rev Mod Phys. 1957; 29: 454.

類似の記事

Modeling of an Electric-fired Brick Oven, Directly Heated
André-Jacques Nlandu Mvuezolo, Jean Noël Luzolo Ngimbi and Lucien Mbozi
DOI10.61927/igmin157
Use of Augmented Reality as a Radiation-free Alternative in Pain Management Spinal Surgeries
Songyuan Lu, Jingwen Hui, Eric Lee, Darin Tsui, Farshad M Ahadian and Frank E Talke*
DOI10.61927/igmin236
Lifestyle and Well-being among Portuguese Firefighters
Laura Carmona, Raquel Pinheiro, Joana Faria-Anjos, Sónia Namorado and Maria José Chambel
DOI10.61927/igmin146

ソーシャルアイコン

研究を公開する

私たちは、科学、技術、工学、医学に関する幅広い種類の記事を編集上の偏見なく公開しています。

提出する

見る 原稿のガイドライン 追加 論文処理料

IgMin 科目を探索する
グーグルスカラー
welcome Image

Google Scholarは2004年11月にベータ版が発表され、幅広い学術領域を航海する学術ナビゲーターとして機能します。それは査読付きジャーナル、書籍、会議論文、論文、博士論文、プレプリント、要約、技術報告書、裁判所の意見、特許をカバーしています。 IgMin の記事を検索